In addition to internal testers, the 10.2 FSD beta software can be tested by those with a “flawless driving score”. Maybe not.
According to the vision of the tech sector, road transport is moving towards autonomy, only approaching the final destination from different directions, when not only a driver but also a government will not need a car. That’s at least a dream, and there’s Waymo, for example, whose vehicles use laser scanning and hairpin, up-to-date 3D maps in addition to cameras and radars to currently provide passenger transportation in some areas of the U.S. without a driver but with central monitoring. The service operates in locations (Chandler, Arizona, suburbs of San Francisco) where the number of accidents and complicated intersections is statistically low (say, a left turn in a large curve is difficult to see with fast cross-traffic).
Waymo vehicles are equipped with a bunch of high-detail and expensive sensors (source: Wired) [+]
Tesla avoids reliance on accurate and high-frequency updated 3D maps that are simply impossible to assemble and keep up-to-date worldwide, and has discarded the use of radar in addition to expensive LiDAR, so today it relies on eight cameras and a couple of ultrasonic sensors and is brand-centered. neural network-based FSD self-conducting code run by the vehicle’s built-in hardware. It’s a riskier and more time-consuming approach to achieving driver-free self-driving, and the thing is several years behind the promises of CEO Elon Musk, with a controversial outcome.
Model 3’s current set now cleverly hides the sensors needed for self-driving without radar (source: Car and Driver) [+]
Currently, who is Tesla full self-driving ability has purchased or subscribed to its software package called, it mostly uses the extra features on the highway to lane, change lanes, up and down, to track the speed of traffic, plus to park on and off with limited urban use. The self-driving in urban traffic however, a feature is being made, just so beta, that most Tesla staff will try, and a couple of YouTubers who will choose for themselves what video to share about the things WSD beta wears. Incidentally, there are as many convincing situations among them, especially among pedestrians and cyclists, as there are silly mistakes – in any case, it is precisely because of these that the driver pays so much attention to immediate control that there has allegedly been no accident related to the beta program.
— Whole Mars Catalog (@WholeMarsBlog) October 10, 2021
That, in turn, could change from today, as the fresh 10.2 FSD beta package, according to Tesla, is reliable enough for everyday people to try – and thousands of owners have the opportunity to do so. Many people have expressed legitimate concerns about the risk of public beta – the director of the San Francisco County Department of Transportation (SFCTA), Tilly Chang for example, the term Full Self-Driving is misleading and the safety of the service is a concern, so it asks various related authorities (DMV, FTC, NHTSA) to closely monitor the program and intervene if necessary.
All release notes pic.twitter.com/wzoMelQOrr
– Tesla Raj (tesla_raj) October 11, 2021
In any case, Musk is not the person to listen to the concerns in particular, and after lengthy internal testing, Tesla has now released beta software to its average person, which otherwise clearly indicates what it is capable of (self-driving on marked roads) and how much supervision it requires ( permanent, with immediate intervention). This is obviously a stark contrast to paid, professional testers at other companies, and even they caused the accident, so everyone from companies interested in autonomy to authorities to people interested in the tech world is wondering if the thing will end well. Accidents, according to Musk, are inevitable anyway, and all that matters is that the machine causes much less over time than the average person, who until then has had to take control of the bucking vehicle. All of this sounds nice, except that a serious FSD beta incident will inevitably make headlines, which could be a slap in the face for the entire autonomy market by the public and the bodies.
This is what Tesla is trying to do with a safe driving score go ahead (safety score beta): the software monitors the driving habits of owners who agree to the program (cornering and braking, preferred tracking distance, number of vehicle emergency warnings, and attention to the road). The safer someone drives, the more points he gets, of course many have remarked that this number doesn’t give a perfect picture of real driving skills, and many can drive so cautiously that it disrupts the rhythm of current traffic. Either way, those who scored 100 points in the United States after driving at least 100 miles today were given the opportunity to install and use FSD Beta today.
Tesla’s ultimate goal is to gradually release the other 100, then 99, 98 and so on. depending on the feedback and incidents, while the FSD beta is releasing a new version roughly every two weeks, hopefully with fewer and fewer bugs. However, there is a particular debate among experts as to when the camera-centric solution of the electric car brand can reach the level (if any) that the driver can get out (and here the legal regulation is also a big question mark) – or just that an average-capable driver, with average attention and reaction time, you can rely on Tesla to drive yourself anywhere without putting too much confidence in the system. The answer to the latter is expected to come sooner from today, and not everyone says it is positive.